典籍英译的副文本研究

上海翻译 ›› 2021, Vol. 157 ›› Issue (2): 13-17.

典籍英译的副文本研究

史芸, 杨枫

(上海交通大学,上海 200240)

收稿日期:2020-12-03 出版日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2021-08-09
作者简介:史芸,上海交通大学外国语学院博士研究生,研究领域:典籍翻译;杨枫,上海交通大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师,研究领域:比较文学与翻译。

Received:2020-12-03 Online:2021-04-10 Published:2021-08-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当下,副文本理论被广泛应用于各种类型的译本阐释与批评中,其中尤以文学作品较为突出。在中国文化走出去的背景下,中华典籍所含的丰富副文本也引起了学者的关注。本文以文学典籍《金瓶梅》四个英译本副文本为研究对象,探究由此呈现的各译本形象:1927年朱翠仁着力打造了一个带有情色意味的东方传奇故事;1939年的米奥本是一部家族冒险史;而埃杰顿建构的是一部精神分析的佳作;2013年芮译本则展现了诗画一体的亚洲经典艺术作品形象。借助副文本理论,《金瓶梅》的域外形象演变得到了历时与共时的阐释。

关键词: 副文本, 典籍, 《金瓶梅》, 形象

中图分类号:

H059

史芸, 杨枫. 典籍英译的副文本研究[J]. 上海翻译, 2021, 157(2): 13-17.

参考文献

[1] Carlitz,Katherine.Puns and puzzles in the “Chin P’ing Mei” 金瓶梅:A look at Chapter 27[J].T’oung Pao,Second Series,1981(67):216-239.
[2] Chang,Su-lee.Review of CHIN P’ING MEI tr.Bernard Miall[J].Asiatic Review,1940(36):616-618.
[3] Chu,Tsui-jen.The Adventures of Hsi Men Ching[M].New York:Print for the Library of Facetious Lore,1927.
[4] Collier,H.Bruce.Reviewed Work(s):Djin Ping Meh by Artur Kibat and Otto Kibat:King Ping Meh by Franz Kuhn:Chin P’ing Mei,the Adventurous History of Hsi Men and His Six Wives by Bernard Miall and Franz Kuhn:The Golden Lotus by Clement Egerton[J].Isis,1944(4):344-346.
[5] Egerton,Clement.The Golden Lotus[M].Taipei:Wen Hsin Bk.Co,1959.
[6] Genette,Gérard.Paratexts:Threshold of Interpretation[M].Jane E.Lewin (trans.) Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
[7] Gertzman,Jay.Bookleggers and Smuthounds:The Trade in Erotica,1920-1940[M].Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,2001.
[8] Giles,Lionel.Reviewed Work(s):The Golden Lotus.A Translation from the Chinese Original of the Novel,Chin P’ing Mei by Clement Egerton;Chin P’ing Mei.The Adventurous History of Hsi Men and His Six Wives by Bernard Miall and Franz Kuhn[J].The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland,1940(3):368-371.
[9] Hermans,Theo.The Translator’s Voice in Translated Narrative[J].Target,1996(8):23-48.
[10] Kovala,Urpo.Translation,paratextual mediation and ideological closure[J].Target,1996(1):119-147.
[11] Miall,Bernard.Chin P’ing Mei:The Adventurous History of Hsi Men and His Six Wives[M].London:John Lane The Bodley Head,1939.
[12] Pellatt,Valeriet.Text,Extratext,Metatext and Paratext in Translation[C].Newcastle,UK:Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2013.
[13] Qi,Lintao.Jin Ping Mei English Translations:Texts,Paratexts and Contexts[M].London and New York:Routledge,2018.
[14] Roy,David.The Plum in the Golden Vase,or Chin P’ing Mei[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1993.
[15] Shryock,J.K.Reviewed Work(s):Chin P’ing Mei by Bernard Miall and Franz Kuhn[J].Journal of the American Oriental Society,1940(2):278-280.
[16] Tahir-Guraglar,Sehnaz.What texts don’t tell:The uses of paratext in translation research[A].In Theo Hermans (ed.).Crosscultural Transgressions-Research Models in Translation Studies[C].Manchester:St Jerome Publishing,2002:44-60.
[17] Yule,Henry.Cathy and The Way Thither,Being a Collection of Medieval Notices of China,Volume 1[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2009.