国际法律口译研究的回顾与展望(1995-2019)——基于11种SSCI/A&HCI收录期刊的计量分析

上海翻译 ›› 2020, Vol. 154 ›› Issue (5): 70-75.

国际法律口译研究的回顾与展望(1995-2019)——基于11种SSCI/A&HCI收录期刊的计量分析

赵军峰, 董燕

(广东外语外贸大学,广州 510420)

收稿日期:2020-02-29 出版日期:2020-10-10 发布日期:2020-11-16
作者简介:赵军峰,博士,广东外语外贸大学翻译学研究中心、高级翻译学院教授、博士生导师,研究领域:法律翻译、翻译史;董燕,广东外语外贸大学翻译学博士研究生,研究领域:法律翻译、口译研究。
基金资助:
国家社科基金项目“国家战略视角下的翻译立法研究” (编号:17BYY005) 。

Received:2020-02-29 Online:2020-10-10 Published:2020-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过对11种SSCI /A&HCI收录期刊中107个法律口译研究(1995-2019)进行文献计量分析,回顾了国际法律口译研究的发展趋势、主题与特点,展望未来发展。研究发现国际法律口译研究数量波动上升,涵盖口译产品、口译职业化、口译政策等八种研究主题,呈现出研究主题多元化、内容深入化、路径跨学科化、方法科学化与实证化以及研究关照社会现实的特点。本文呼吁加大对口译政策、口译技术等方面的研究,同时注重对中国内地法律口译实践的考察。

关键词: 法律口译, 产品, 政策, 职业化

中图分类号:

H059

赵军峰, 董燕. 国际法律口译研究的回顾与展望(1995-2019)——基于11种SSCI/A&HCI收录期刊的计量分析[J]. 上海翻译, 2020, 154(5): 70-75.

参考文献

[1] Berk-Seligson, S. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process [M]. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2017.
[2] Braun, S. Video-mediated interpreting in legal settings in England [J]. Translation and Interpreting Studies. The Journal of the American Translation and Interpreting Studies Association, 2018(3): 393-420.
[3] Christensen, T. P. User expectations and evaluation: A case study of a court interpreting event [J]. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 2011(1): 1-24.
[4] Defrancq, B. & Verliefde, S. Interpreter-mediated “paternalistic” interaction in a judge-centered courtroom [J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2017(2): 209-231.
[5] Foley, T. Lawyers and legal interpreters: Different clients, different culture [J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2006(1): 97-104.
[6] Gaiba, F. Interpretation at the Nuremberg Trial [J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting,1999(1): 9-22.
[7] González, R. D., Vásquez, V. F. & Mikkelson, H. Fundamentals of Court Interpretation: Theory, Policy, and Practice [M]. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 1991.
[8] Hale, S. B., Bond, N. & Sutton, J. Interpreting accent in the courtroom[J]. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 2011(1): 48-61.
[9] Hale, S. et al. The effect of interpreting modes on witness credibility assessments [J].Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2017(1): 69-96.
[10] Inghilleri, M. Mediating zones of uncertainty: Interpreter agency, the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication [J]. The Translator, 2005(1): 69-85.
[11] Jacobsen, B. Interactional pragmatics and court interpreting: An analysis of face[J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2008(1): 128-158.
[12] Lee, J. Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters [J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2009(1): 35-56.
[13] Martin, A. & Taibi, M. Complexities of high profile interpreting: The case of the Madrid train bomb trial [J]. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2012(2): 145-164.
[14] Martínez-Gómez, A. Criminals interpreting for criminals: Breaking or shaping norms? [J]. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 2014(2): 174-193.
[15] Martínez-Gómez, A. Language rights and interpreting services in Spanish prisons [J]. Babel, 2018(6): 813-834.
[16] Morris, R. The moral dilemmas of court interpreting [J]. The Translator, 1995(1): 25-46.
[17] Morris, R. The gum syndrome: Predicaments in court interpreting [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 1999(1): 6-29.
[18] Napier, J. & Spencer, D. Jury instructions: Comparing hearing and deaf jurors’ comprehension via direct or mediated communication [J]. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 2017(1):1-29.
[19] Nicholson, N. S. The law on language in the European Union: Policy development for interpreting/translation services in criminal proceedings [J]. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 2009(1): 61-90.
[20] Núñez, G. G. On translation policy [J]. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies,2016(1): 87-109.
[21] Pease, A., Pease, J. C. & Cheung, A. K. Formal ontology for discourse analysis of a corpus of court interpreting [J]. Babel, 2018(4): 594-618.
[22] Pöchhacker, F. Introducing Interpreting Studies [M]. New York: Routledge, 2016.
[23] Pöllabauer, S. “During the interview, the interpreter will provide a faithful translation.” The potentials and pitfalls of researching interpreting in immigration, asylum, and police settings: Methodology and research paradigms [J]. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series-Themes in Translation Studies, 2006(5): 229-244.
[24] Rigney, A. C. Questioning in interpreted testimony [J]. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law,2007(1): 83-108.
[25] Solová, R. The Polish sworn translator: Current training profile and perspectives [J]. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer,2015(2): 243-259.
[26] 滕梅.翻译政策研究及其对当下中国的借鉴意义[J].上海翻译,2014(1):35-39.
[27] 王茜,刘和平.2004—2013中国口译研究的发展与走向[J].上海翻译,2015(1):77-83.
[28] 赵军峰,陈珊.中西法庭口译研究回顾与展望[J].中国科技翻译,2008(3):19-22,9.