机器翻译对二语写作的影响研究:焦点与趋势

上海翻译 ›› 2022, Vol. 165 ›› Issue (4): 35-39.

机器翻译对二语写作的影响研究:焦点与趋势

吴影¹, 李朝²

1.长春光华学院,吉林长春 130033;
2.吉林大学,吉林长春 130000

收稿日期:2021-06-25 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-07-28
作者简介:吴影,长春光华学院副教授,研究领域:应用语言学、翻译理论与实践教学研究;李朝,吉林大学公共外语教育学院教授,研究领域:应用语言学、翻译理论与实践教学研究。
基金资助:
吉林省教育厅人文社科研究项目“生态翻译学视域下吉林省旅游景区外宣文本英译研究”(编号: JJKH20211414SK)。

Received:2021-06-25 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来,机器翻译对二语写作影响的研究发展迅速,为二语写作研究带来了新视角。本文追溯了机器翻译对二语写作影响研究的演进历程,归纳了研究聚类和目前的研究重点,并结合相关技术领域发展的最新动向,着重分析了该领域的发展趋势,针对未来机器翻译在二语写作研究中的应用提出了建议。

关键词: 机器翻译, 二语写作, 影响, 焦点, 趋势

中图分类号:

H059

吴影, 李朝. 机器翻译对二语写作的影响研究:焦点与趋势[J]. 上海翻译, 2022, 165(4): 35-39.

[1] Adriaens, Geert. Simplified English grammar and style correction in an MT framework: The LRE SECC project [J]. Aslib Proceedings, 1995(3) : 78-88.
[2] Al Nahas, A.,Tunali,M. S. & Akgul, Y. S. Supervised text style transfer using neural machine translation: Converting between old and modern turkish as an example[DB/OL]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335351552. (2021-01-16)[2021-02-10].
[3] Barrón-Cedeño, A. On the mono-and cross-language detection of text reuse and plagiarism[A]. In Fabio Crestani, et al (eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval,SIGIR 2010[C]. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2010: 914-915.
[4] Big Think. Here's the innovative writing tool you've been waiting for [EB/OL]. https://bigthink.com/high-culture/whitesmoke-grammar/.(2020-10-20)[2021-01-25].
[5] Bowker, L. & Ciro, J. B. Machine Translation and Global Research: Towards Improved Machine Translation Literacy in the Scholarly Community [M]. Emerald: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2019.
[6] Burchardt, A.,Arle, L.,Vivien M. A new deal for translation quality [J/OL]. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00736-5.(2020-07-20)[2020-11-24].
[7] Caswell, I., Liang, B. Recent Advances in Google Translate [EB/OL]. https://www.googblogs.com/recent-advances-in-google-translate/. (2020-06-08)[2021-01-15].
[8] Chon, Y. V., Shin, D. & Kim, G. E. Comparing L2 learners' writing against parallel machine-translated texts: Raters' assessment, linguistic complexity and errors [J]. System, 2021(96): 102-408.
[9] Garcia, I., Pena, M. I. Machine translation-assisted language learning: writing for beginners [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2011(5): 471-487.
[10] Jolley, J. R., Maimone, L. Free online machine translation: Use and perceptions by Spanish students and instructors[A]. In Aleidine J. (ed.). Learn Language, Explore Cultures, Transform Lives [C]. Lincoln: University of Nabraska-Lincoln, 2015: 181-200.
[11] Lee, M., Briggs N. Effects of using machine translation to mediate the revision process of Korean university students' academic writing[J]. ReCALL, 2021(1): 18-33.
[12] Niño, A. Evaluating the use of machine translation post-editing in the foreign language class [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2008(1): 29-49.
[13] Niño, A. Machine translation in foreign language learning: Language learners' and tutors' perceptions of its advantages and disadvantages [J]. ReCALL, 2009(2): 241-258.
[14] Niño, A. Exploring the use of online machine translation for independent language learning[J]. Research in Learning Technology, 2020(28): 2402. http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2402. (2020-09-04)[2021-03-16].
[15] O'Brien, S., Simard, M., Goulet, M. J. Machine translation and self-post-editing for academic writing support: Quality explorations[A]. In Joss M., Sheila C.,et al (eds.). Translation Quality Assessment:From Principles to Practice[C].Cham: Springer, 2018:237-262.
[16] Paris, C.,Vander Linden, K. An interactive support tool for writing multilingual manuals [J]. Computer, 1996 (7): 49-56.
[17] Rescigno, A. A., Vanmassenhove, E., Monti, J. & Way, A. A case study of natural gender phenomena in translation: A comparison of Google Translate, Bing Microsoft Translator and DeepL for English to Italian, French and Spanish[A]. In Johanna M., et al(eds.). Proceedings of the Seventh Italian Conference on Computational Linguiistics CLiC-it[C]. Bologna:Technical University of Aache, 2020: 359-364.
[18] Rogerson, A. M., McCarthy, G. Using internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? [J]. Internaptional Journal for Educational Integrity, 2017, (1): 1-15.
[19] Stapleton, P., Kin, B. L. K. Assessing the accuracy and teachers' impressions of Google Translate: A study of primary L2 writers in Hong Kong [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2019(56): 18-34.
[20] Treece, R. “Yo Lata Mosca Espalda”: Student compositions and online translators[A]. In L.Gómez Chova,et al (eds.). INTED2011 Proceedings [C]. Valencia:IATED, 2011: 6410-6414.
[21] Tsai, S. C. Using google translate in EFL drafts: A preliminary investigation [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019(5-6): 510-526.
[22] Tsai, S. C. Chinese students' perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing [J].Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2020(7): 1-23.
[23] White, M., Rozovskaya, A. A comparative study of synthetic data generation methods for grammatical error correction [A]. In Jill Burstein et al (eds.). Proceedings of the Fifteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications[C]. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 198-208.
[24] Xu, J. Machine translation for editing compositions in a Chinese language class: Task design and student beliefs [J]. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 2020(1):1-18.
[25] Zhou, J., Li, C., Liu, H., et al. Chinese grammatical error correction using statistical and neural models [A]. In Zhang,M., Ng,V. et al (eds.). Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing.NLPCC 2018[C]. Cham :Springer, 2018: 117-128.
[26] Zhu, J., Xia, Y., Wu, L., et al. Incorporating bert into neural machine translation [DB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06823.(2020-02-17)[2021-2-11].
[27] 冯全功,崔启亮.译后编辑研究:焦点透析与发展趋势[J]. 上海翻译,2016(6):67-74.
[28] 郭望皓,范江威,张克亮. 融合语言学知识的神经机器翻译研究进展[J]. 计算机科学与探索. 2021,15(7):1183-1194.
[29] 何绍荣. 基于互信息和关系积理论的特征选择方法[J]. 计算机工程,2010(13): 257-259.

机器翻译对二语写作的影响研究:焦点与趋势

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李翔, 高朝阳. 国外机器翻译研究的知识图谱和发展趋势[J]. 上海翻译, 2024, 175(2): 41-47.
[2]	张保国, 周鹤. 石声汉译著成果的国际传播与影响[J]. 上海翻译, 2024, 174(1): 79-83.
[3]	戴光荣, 王晨谕. 我国应用翻译研究发展及展望:基于历届全国研讨会的分析[J]. 上海翻译, 2024, 174(1): 7-13.
[4]	吕红艳, 钱伟扬. 新时代我国翻译硕士教育:回顾与展望[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 173(6): 58-62.
[5]	徐华东, 姚振军. 后现代语境中机译伦理问题研究[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 172(5): 12-17.
[6]	王均松, 肖维青, 崔启亮. 人工智能时代技术驱动的翻译模式:嬗变、动因及启示[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 171(4): 14-19.
[7]	叶慧君, 王晔. 后现代语境下中国文化“走出去”的趋势与反思[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 170(3): 64-69.
[8]	王华树, 刘世界. 智慧翻译教育研究:理念、路径与趋势[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 170(3): 47-51.
[9]	颜小英. 近五年国家社科基金文本翻译研究立项热点及趋势分析(2018-2022)[J]. 上海翻译, 2023, 170(3): 42-46.
[10]	单宇, 汪韵. 外籍汉学译者研究:热点与趋势[J]. 上海翻译, 2022, 167(6): 56-61.
[11]	杨文地, 范梓锐. 科技语篇机器翻译的译后编辑例析[J]. 上海翻译, 2021, 161(6): 54-59.
[12]	李奉栖. 基于神经网络的在线机器翻译系统英汉互译质量对比研究[J]. 上海翻译, 2021, 159(4): 46-52.
[13]	王世钰. 译文影响下的译者屈从与焦虑探究[J]. 上海翻译, 2021, 158(3): 13-17.
[14]	刘宇波, 张威. 新世纪以来的医疗口译研究:回顾与展望[J]. 上海翻译, 2021, 157(2): 70-75.
[15]	黄忠廉, 张潇. 翻译学科百年:演进、反思与趋势[J]. 上海翻译, 2020, 155(6): 1-6.