从依附到独立:国外翻译共性研究的可视化分析(2000-2023)

上海翻译 ›› 2024, Vol. 174 ›› Issue (1): 14-20.

从依附到独立:国外翻译共性研究的可视化分析(2000-2023)

赵秋荣¹, 李文双²

1.北京科技大学,北京 100083;
2.南开大学,天津 300071

收稿日期:2023-02-24 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-23
作者简介:赵秋荣,博士,北京科技大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师,研究领域:翻译学、语料库语言学;李文双,南开大学外国语学院博士研究生,研究领域:语料库语言学、社会翻译学。
基金资助:
国家社科基金一般项目“基于历时复合语料库1919—2019的翻译对现代汉语语言特征影响研究”(编号:19BYY107)。

Received:2023-02-24 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 语料库翻译研究的目标之一是从大规模语料中寻找翻译语言的共性特征,翻译共性作为语料库翻译学的核心概念之一,相关研究逐渐从规律分析转向动因挖掘。本文运用CiteSpace软件对Web of Science中收录的2000-2023年翻译共性相关文献展开可视化分析,在梳理国外该领域的研究热点和研究前沿的同时,归纳了三类主要研究路径:传统语言学路径、认知翻译学路径和社会翻译学路径。本文认为,翻译共性研究从依附走向独立,逐渐形成多理论融合的系统分析框架,翻译的跨学科属性和学科独立性愈发凸显。

关键词: 翻译共性, 可视化分析, 传统语言学路径, 认知翻译学路径, 社会翻译学路径

中图分类号:

H059

赵秋荣, 李文双. 从依附到独立:国外翻译共性研究的可视化分析(2000-2023)[J]. 上海翻译, 2024, 174(1): 14-20.

参考文献

[1] Baker, M. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications[A]. In Baker, M., Francis, G. & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (eds.). Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1993: 233-252.
[2] Becher, V. Explicitation and Implicitation in Translation: A Corpus-based Study of English-German and German-English Translations of Business Texts[D]. Hamburg: Hamburg University, 2011.
[3] Biber, D., Egbert, J. & Davies, M. Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers[J]. Corpora, 2015, 10(1): 11-45.
[4] Cartoni, B. & Zufferey, S. A multifactorial analysis of explicitation in translation [J]. Target, 2014, 26(3): 361-384.
[5] Doherty, M. Structural Propensities Translating Nominal Word Groups from English into German [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
[6] Fabricius-Hansen, C. Informational density: A problem for translation and translation theory [J]. Linguistics, 1996, 34(3): 521-566.
[7] Galvan, B. E. Translation depends on the artist: Two approaches to the illustrations of James and the Giant Peach through the prism of intersemiotic translation [J].Babel, 2019, 65(1): 61-80.
[8] Goncalves, J. Looking for relevance into the eyes in search of interpretive resemblance in translation throughgazing data[J]. Cadernos de traducao, 2020, 40(2): 17-44.
[9] Halverson, S. The cognitive basis of translation universals[J]. Target, 2003, 15(2): 197-241.
[10] Hansen-Schirra, S. & Steiner, E. Towards a typology of translation studies[A]. In Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S. & Steiner, E. (eds.). Cross-linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English-German[C]. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012: 255-279.
[11] Hawkins, J. Why are zero-marked phrases close to their heads?[A]. In Rohdenburg, G. & Mondorf, B. (eds.). Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English[C]. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2003: 175-204.
[12] Hawkins, J. Cross-linguistic Variation and Efficiency [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[13] Hirsch, G. Adequate contextual explicitation in translation[J]. Target, 2020, 32(1): 1-26.
[14] Jawad, H. Shifts in translating Jeremy Munday into Arabic: Asymmetric explicitation[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2014, 15(1): 51-66.
[15] Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. & Sanchez. M. T. Explicitation and implicitation in translation: Combining comparable and parallel corpus methodologies[J]. MonTI, 2021, 13: 62-92.
[16] Kruger, H. That again: A multivariate analysis of the factors conditioning syntactic explicitness in translated English[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2018, 20(1): 1-33.
[17] Kruger, H. & De Sutter, G. Reconceptualizing that-omission in translated and non-translated English using the MuPDAR approach[J]. Translation, Cognition and Behavior, 2018, 1(2): 251-290.
[18] Newmark, P. About Translation[M]. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 1991.
[19] Pang, S. & Wang, K. Language contact through translation: The influence of explicitness in English-Chinese translation on language change in vernacular Chinese[J]. Target, 2020, 32(1): 420-455.
[20] Pym, A. Explaining explicitation[A]. In Karoly, K. & Foris, A. (eds.). New Trends in Translation Studies: In Honour of Kinga Klaudy[C]. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 2005: 29-34.
[21] Redelinghuys, K. & Kruger, H. Using the features of translated language to investigate translation expertise: A corpus-based study[J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2015, 20(3): 293-325.
[22] Robin, E. Translation universals revisited[J]. International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, 2017, 15(1): 51-66.
[23] Rohdenburg, G. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1996, 7(2): 149-182.
[24] Serhii, Z. Investigating cognitive and psycholinguistic features of translation universals[J]. Psycholinguistics, 2019, 26(2): 114-134.
[25] Shen, L. Referential explicitation of English translated diplomatic discourse? A 50-year 56-lingual corpus-based study on United Nations general debate speeches (1970-2019)[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2023, 24(1): 25-51.
[26] Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
[27] Tirkkonen-Condit, S. Unique items, over- or under-represented in translated language?[A]. In Mauranen, A. & Kujamaki, P. (eds.). Translation Universals, Do They Exist?[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2004: 176-184.
[28] Tsai, Y. Diachronic observation of lexical and syntactic patterns in English translations of Taiwan patent texts [J]. Perspectives, 2020, 29(1): 1-21.
[29] Van Beveren, A., De Sutter, G.& Colleman, T. The mechanisms behind increased explicitness in translations: A multi-factorial corpus investigation of the om-alternation in translated and original Dutch[A]. In Vandevoorde, L., Daems, J. & Defrancq, B. (eds.). New Empirical Perspectives on Translation and Interpreting[C]. London: Routledge, 2019: 38-66.
[30] Van Rooy, B. & Kruger, H. Factors that influence the omission of the Afrikaans complementizer that[J].Journal of Humanities, 2016,56(1): 102-116.
[31] Vinay, J.P. & Darbelnet, J. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation[M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1995.
[32] Weinreich, U. Languages in Contact[M]. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1979.
[33] Xiao, R. & Dai, G. Lexical and grammatical properties of translated Chinese: Translation universal hypotheses reevaluated from the Chinese perspective[J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2014, 10(1): 11-55.
[34] Zhang, X., Kruger, H. & Fang, J.Explicitation in children’s literature translated from English to Chinese: A corpus-based study of personal pronouns[J].Perspectives, 2019, 28(2): 1-20.
[35] 郑敏宇. 翻译的跨学科研究路径——以国家社科基金重大项目选题为例[J]. 上海翻译,2023(3):36-41.