译者认知努力研究的进展与趋势——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析

上海翻译 ›› 2026, Vol. 186 ›› Issue (1): 45-51.

译者认知努力研究的进展与趋势——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析

王家义¹, 张钲宇^1,2, 李德凤²

1.湖南工程学院,湖南湘潭 411100;
2.澳门大学,澳门 999078

收稿日期:2025-01-18 发布日期:2026-02-09
通讯作者: 李德凤,博士,澳门大学人文学院教授、博士生导师,研究领域:语料库翻译学、翻译认知过程。
作者简介:王家义,博士,湖南工程学院外国语学院教授,研究领域:语料库翻译学、翻译认知过程;张钲宇,澳门大学人文学院博士研究生,湖南工程学院外国语学院讲师,研究领域:翻译认知过程、翻译技术。
基金资助:
国家社科基金年度重点项目“中华文化核心概念多语种多模态译介认知机制研究”(编号:25AYY002)、湖南省哲学社会科学重点项目“人机共译模式下译者视觉信息加工研究”(编号:24ZDB036)、湖南省教育厅科学研究项目“商务翻译教学中的译者术语认知研究”(编号:24C0364)。

Received:2025-01-18 Published:2026-02-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 译者认知努力作为驱动翻译行为的内在心智动力,是揭示译者认知“黑匣子”运作机制的重要参照。近年来,随着键盘记录和眼动追踪等研究方法的广泛应用,该领域研究发展迅速,但也呈现出方法各异、视角分散的特点,亟需系统梳理。本文基于CiteSpace软件,对2004至2024年间Web of Science数据库中收录的译者认知努力相关文献进行可视化分析,从发文情况、文献影响力与研究热点三个维度展开综述。研究发现:该领域发文量总体呈上升态势,中国地区贡献尤为突出;高影响力文献集中于理论构建与方法创新;研究热点从早期以眼动为主的笔译认知努力研究,逐步扩展至口译认知负荷测量、译后编辑任务难度、计算机辅助口译及多模态加工等多个方向。本文进一步提出未来研究应关注技术融合、多模态数据交叉互证及跨学科理论整合,以推动译者认知努力研究的纵深发展。

关键词: 译者认知努力, CiteSpace可视化分析, 翻译过程研究, 跨学科

中图分类号:

H059

王家义, 张钲宇, 李德凤. 译者认知努力研究的进展与趋势——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 上海翻译, 2026, 186(1): 45-51.

参考文献

[1] Baddeley, A. Working memory and language: An overview[J]. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2003, 36(3): 189-208.
[2] Carl, M., Schaeffer, M. & Bangalore, S. The CRITT translation process research database[A]. In Carl, M. Schaeffer, M. & Bangalore, S. (eds.). New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB[C]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2016:13-54.
[3] Chen, S. The construct of cognitive load in interpreting and its measurement[J]. Perspectives, 2017, 25(4): 640-657.
[4] Chen, S. & Kruger, J. L. The effectiveness of computer-assisted interpreting: A preliminary study based on English-Chinese consecutive interpreting[J]. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 2023, 18(3): 399-420.
[5] Chen, S. & Kruger, J. L. A computer-assisted consecutive interpreting workflow: Training and evaluation[J]. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 2024, 18(3): 380-399.
[6] Cui, Y. & Zheng, B. Extralinguistic consultation in English-Chinese translation: A study drawing on eye-tracking and screen-recording data[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 1-15.
[7] Dai, G. & Liu, S. Towards predicting post-editing effort with source text readability: An investigation for English-Chinese machine translation[J]. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 2024, 41: 206-229.
[8] Daneman, M. Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1991, 20(6): 445-464.
[9] Doherty, S., O’Brien, S. & Carl, M. Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique[J]. Machine Translation, 2010, 24(1): 1-13.
[10] Dragsted, B. Indicators of difficulty in translation—Correlating product and process data[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2012, 13(1): 81-98.
[11] Elmer, S., Hänggi, J. & Jäncke, L. Processing demands upon cognitive, linguistic, and articulatory functions promote grey matter plasticity in the adult multilingual brain: Insights from simultaneous interpreters[J]. Cortex, 2014, 54: 179-189.
[12] Havelka, I. & Valacchi, M. Interpreter-computer interaction in RSI: The role of graphical user interfaces in interpreters’ perception[J]. Tradumàtica, 2024(22): 377-400.
[13] Huang, Y., Shi, W. & Wen, J. Technology challenges and aids: The sustainable development of professional interpreters in listening comprehension effectiveness and interpreting performance[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8): 6828.
[14] Hunziker Heeb, A., Lehr, C. & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. Situated translators: Cognitive load and the role of emotions[A]. In Muñoz Martín, R., Sun, S. & Li, D. (eds.). Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies[C]. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021:47-65.
[15] Hvelplund, K. T. Eye tracking and the translation process: Reflections on the analysis and interpretation of eye-tracking data[J]. MonTI Special Issue-Minding Translation, 2014(1): 201-223.
[16] Jia, Y.& Zheng, B. The interaction effect between source text complexity and machine translation quality on the task difficulty of NMT post-editing from English to Chinese: A multi-method study[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2022, 23(1): 36-55.
[17] Jiang, X. & Jiang, Y. Effect of dependency distance of source text on disfluencies in interpreting[J]. Lingua, 2020(243): 1-18.
[18] Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2017, 82(13): 1-26.
[19] Lacruz, I., Shreve, G. M. Pauses and cognitive effort in post-editing[A]. In O’Brien, S., Balling, L. & Carl, M., et al (eds.). Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Application[C]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014:246-272.
[20] Liang, J., Lv, Q. & Liu, Y. Quantifying interpreting types: Language sequence mirrors cognitive load minimization in interpreting tasks[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019(10): 1-13.
[21] Lin, X., Lei, V. L. C. & Li, D., et al. Which is more costly in Chinese to English simultaneous interpreting,“pairing” or “transphrasing”? Evidence from an fNIRS neuroimaging study[J]. Neurophotonics, 2018, 5(2): 1-12.
[22] O’Brien, S. Pauses as indicators of cognitive effort in post-editing machine translation output[J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2006, 7(1): 1-21.
[23] O’Brien, S. Towards predicting post-editing productivity[J]. Machine Translation, 2011, 25(3): 197-215.
[24] Plevoets, K. & Defrancq, B. The cognitive load of interpreters in the European Parliament: A corpus-based study of predictors for the disfluency uh (m)[J]. Interpreting, 2018, 20(1): 1-28.
[25] Schou, L., Dragsted, B. & Carl, M. Ten years of Translog[A]. In Mees, I. M., Alves, F. & Gopferich, S. (eds.). Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research[C]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press, 2009: 37-50.
[26] Seeber, K. G. Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories—new models[J]. Interpreting, 2011, 13(2): 176-204.
[27] Shen, M., Lin, Y. & Lv, Q., et al. A corpus-based analysis of the effect of syntactic complexity on disfluency in consecutive interpreting[J]. Lingua, 2023(291): 1-14.
[28] Su, W. & Li, D. Exploring processing patterns of Chinese-English sight translation: An eye-tracking study[J]. Babel, 2020, 66(6): 999-1024.
[29] Wu, Y., Schuster, M. & Chen, Z., et al. Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144, 2016:1-23.
[30] Yagura, H., Tanaka, H. & Kinoshita, T., et al. Analysis of selective attention processing on experienced simultaneous interpreters using EEG phase synchronization[A]. 2020 the 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)[C]. New Jersey: IEEE, 2020:66-69.
[31] Yuan, L. & Wang, B. Eye-tracking the processing of visual input of live transcripts in remote simultaneous interpreting: Preliminary findings[J]. Forum, 2024, 22(1): 118-144.
[32] 傅敬民.翻译研究的问题意识与学科边际[J].中国外语,2016(5):14-19.
[33] 李德凤.翻译认知过程研究之沿革与方法述要[J].中国外语,2017(4):1, 11-13.
[34] 李杰,陈超美.CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可视化(第三版)[M] .北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2022.
[35] 刘剑,胡开宝.多模态口译语料库的建设与应用研究[J].中国外语,2015(5):77-85.
[36] 苏雯超,李德凤,曹洪文.论口译认知负荷的眼动研究[J].外语学刊,2021(3):109-114.
[37] 王家义,李德凤,李丽青.大数据背景下的互联网翻译——开源理念与模式创新[J].中国翻译,2018(2):78-82.
[38] 王湘玲,王立阳.国际翻译过程研究前沿动态的可视化分析(2001-2020)[J].上海翻译,2022(4):17-22.
[39] 文旭,张钺奇.认知翻译学研究新进展[J].上海翻译,2023(1):6-12.
[40] 于霖林,金胜昔.翻译过程研究中的认知负荷与认知努力[J].西安外国语大学学报,2025(2):102-107.