翻译语言与动态对比语言学

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 翻译语言作为“第三语码”进入对比分析框架,并非止于拓展对比语言学的学科内涵,更为重要的是,唯有如此,我们才能在对比分析中解释两种自然语言之间的互动影响关系,从而超越以往语言对比研究中为了对比而对比、为了纯粹的共性/差异发掘而进行对比分析的范式。“动态对比语言学”可定义为:对两种自然语言及其之间的翻译语言作为第三语码进行对比分析并对三者之间的互动关系进行共时或历时考察的语言研究,其终极目标是探究以语言沟通为基础的世界关系及文明互鉴。

关键词: 翻译语言, 第三语码, 互动关系, 动态对比语言学

中图分类号:

H059

刘春梅, 尚新. 翻译语言与动态对比语言学[J]. 上海翻译, 2022, 166(5): 8-13.

参考文献

[1] Baker, M. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications [A]. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.). Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1993: 233-250.
[2] Baker, M. Corpus-based translation studies: The challenges that lie ahead [A]. In H. Somers (ed.). Terminlology, LSP and Translation: Studies in Language Engineering in Honor of Juan C. Sager [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,1996: 175-186.
[3] Blum-Kulka, S.Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation [A]. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.). Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies [C]. Tubingen: Gunter Narr,1986: 17-35.
[4] Fisiak, J. Some introductory notes concerning contrastive linguistics [A]. In J. Fisiak (ed.). Contrastive Linguistics and the Language Teacher [C]. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press Ltd.,1981: 1-12.
[5] Frawley, W. Prolegomenon to a theory of translation [A]. In W. Frawley (ed.). Translation: Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives [C]. London: Associated University Press, 1984: 159-175.
[6] Granger, S. From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora [A]. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg & M. Johansson (eds.). Languages in Contrast. Papers from a Symposium on Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies in Lund, 4-5 March 1994 [C]. Lund: Lund University Press, 1996: 37-51.
[7] Hopkinson, C. Factors in linguistic interference: A case study in translation [J]. SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation, 2007, 2(1): 13-23.
[8] James, C. Contrastive Analysis [M]. Colchester/London: Longman Group Ltd., 1980.
[9] Johansson, S. On the role of corpora in cross-linguistic research [A]. In S. Johansson & S. Oksefjell (eds.). Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, Method, and Case Studies [C]. Amsterdam / Atlanta: Editions Rodopi B. V., 1998: 3-24.
[10] Johansson, S. Contrastive linguistics and corpora [A]. In S. Granger, J. Lerot & S. Petch-Tyson (eds.). Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies [C]. Amsterdam / New York: Editions Rodopi B. V., 2003: 31-44.
[11] Krzeszowski, T. P. Contrasting Languages: The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics [M]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990.
[12] Lado, R.Linguistics Across Cultures—Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers [M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1957.
[13] Lavisosa, S. Similarity and difference in corpus-based translation studies [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages,2007(5): 56-63.
[14] Wardhaugh, R. The contrastive analysis hypothesis[J]. TESOL Quarterly,1970, 4 (2): 140-148.
[15] 吕叔湘. 通过对比研究语法[J].语言教学与研究,1977 (2): 4-18.
[16] 潘文国. 汉英语对比纲要[M]. 北京:北京语言大学出版社,1997.
[17] 潘文国,谭慧敏. 对比语言学:历史与哲学思考[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[18] 潘文国,谭慧敏. 中西对比语言学——历史与哲学思考[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2018.
[19] 庞双子,王克非. 从“第三语码的拓展”看语料库翻译学动向[J]. 外语教学,2019 (1): 95-99.
[20] 尚新. 试论第三语码在对比分析中的地位及其描写研究模型[J]. 外语教学与研究,2021 (6): 842-853.
[21] 石秀文,管新潮. 基于语料库的汉英词语的翻译特色研究[J]. 上海翻译,2015 (4): 80-84.
[22] 王菊泉. 什么是对比语言学[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2011.
[23] 王克非,秦洪武. 英译汉语言特征探讨——基于对应语料库的宏观分析[J]. 外语学刊,2009(1):102-105.
[24] 王克非,秦洪武. 基于历时复合语料库的翻译与现代汉语变化考察[J]. 外语教学与研究,2017(1): 37-50.
[25] 许余龙. 对比语言学[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,1992/2002.
[26] 赵秋荣,王克非. 英译汉翻译语言的阶段性特点——基于历时类比语料库的考察[J]. 中国翻译,2013 (3): 15-20.
[27] 朱一凡. 翻译引发现代汉语欧化结构的机制——基于语料库的五四时期汉语欧化结构研究[J]. 外语研究,2011(6): 76-81.