中国政治文献译入/译出差异的多维分析

上海翻译 ›› 2026, Vol. 190 ›› Issue (5): 34-41.

中国政治文献译入/译出差异的多维分析

宋超¹, 王克非²

1.湖南大学,湖南长沙 410082;
2.广东外语外贸大学,广东广州 510420

收稿日期:2026-06-09 出版日期:2026-09-10 发布日期:2026-09-14
通讯作者: 王克非,广东外语外贸大学云山工作室首席专家,北京外国语大学讲席教授,研究领域:语言学、翻译学。
作者简介:宋超,湖南大学外国语学院助理教授,研究领域:语料库语言学、翻译学。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大招标项目“围绕汉语的超大型多语汉外平行语料库集群研制与应用研究”(编号: 21&ZD290)。

Received:2026-06-09 Online:2026-09-10 Published:2026-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国政治文献的海外译介是对外话语传播的重要一环,但迄今鲜有研究关注海外译本。本文基于多维分析法,对美国战略与国际问题研究中心的译入与中国官方的译出进行比较分析。研究表明,政治文献翻译存在六个主要维度,译入与译出在其中四个维度上存在显著差异,即:1)信息密度与语义对等;2)目标语导向与读者接受;3)显化;4)表述性移植和低易读性。译入重视文本的“一手价值”,偏重源语表征与形式保留;译出则有更强的目标语导向,转换更为灵活,译文的可读性更强。分析表明,译入方的策略难以有效应对复杂修辞,且在政治表述上存在偏误。相比之下,译出的翻译取向符合我国的时代需求。在此基础上,未来的对外译介可进一步探索分层化与精准化传播策略,在面向专家型读者的文本中适度保留源语的异质性元素。

关键词: 译入, 译出, 政治文献翻译, 多维分析法

中图分类号:

H059

宋超, 王克非. 中国政治文献译入/译出差异的多维分析[J]. 上海翻译, 2026, 190(5): 34-41.

参考文献

[1] Biber, D. Variation across Speech and Writing[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[2] Blanchette, J. A. Secret plot by an ancient civilization to take over the world: Book review of Michael Pillsbury[EB/OL]. https://chinafocus.ucsd.edu/2015/04/02/a-secret-plot-by-an-ancient-civilization-to-take-over-the-world-book-review-of-michael-pillsbury/(2015-04-02)[2026-01-21].
[3] CSIS. About[EB/OL]. https://interpret.csis.org/about/(2026-01-22)[2026-01-22].
[4] Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction[M]. New York: Random House, 1978.
[5] Fravel, T. China's search for assured retaliation[J]. International Security, 2010(2): 48-87.
[6] Hu, X., Xiao, R., Hardie, A. How do English translations differ from non-translated English writings? A multi-feature statistical model for linguistic variation analysis[J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2019(2): 347-382.
[7] Kania, E. Chinese advances in unmanned systems and the military applications of artificial intelligence: The PLA's trajectory towards unmanned, “intelligentized” warfare, testimony before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission[EB/OL]. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Kania_Testimony.pdf. (2017-02-23)[2026-01-22].
[8] Kania, E. Chinese military innovation in artificial intelligence[EB/OL]. https://www.cnas.org/publications/congressional-testimony/chinese-military-innovation-in-artificial-intelligence (2019-06-07)[2026-01-22].
[9] Kania, E. “AI weapons” in China's military innovation[EB/OL]. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ai-weapons-in-chinas-military-innovation/(2020-05-08)[2026-01-22].
[10] Kania, E., Laskai, L. Myths and Realities of China's Military-Civil Fusion Strategy[M]. Washington: Center for New American Security, 2021.
[11] Koller, W. The concept of equivalence and the object of Translation Studies[J]. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 1995(2): 191-222.
[12] Manikandan, S. Data transformation[J]. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 2010(2): 126-127.
[13] Nord, C. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis[M]. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005.
[14] Pan, F., Kim, K. H., Li, T. Institutional versus individual translations of Chinese political texts: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis[J]. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 2020(34): 51-77.
[15] Pan, F., Wang, B. Is interpreting of China's political discourse becoming more target-oriented? A corpus-based diachronic comparison between the 1990s and the 2010s[J]. Babel, 2021(2): 222-244.
[16] Pokorn, N. K. Challenging the Traditional Axiom: Translation into a Non-mother Tongue[M]. London: Routledge, 2005.
[17] Pym, A. Translating as risk management[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2015(85): 67-80.
[18] Reiss, K. Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation[J]. Poetics Today, 1981(4): 121-131.
[19] Stevens, J. P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5^th edition)[M]. New York: Routledge,2009.
[20] Wuthnow, J. Chinese Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic Rationales, Risks, and Implications[M]. Washington: National Defense University Press, 2017.
[21] Wuthnow, J. Transforming China's national security architecture in the Xi era[EB/OL]. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/Joel_Wuthnow_Testimony.pdf (2022-01-27)[2026-01-22].
[22] 高玉霞, 任东升. 美国“翻译中国”行动及其影响评析[J]. 当代美国评论, 2024(4): 64-82.
[23] 黄友义. 如何突破中外文化差异让世界更了解中国?[N/OL]. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2021/11-04/9601886.shtml.(2021-11-04)[2026-01-22].
[24] 黄友义.从翻译世界到翻译中国——对外传播与翻译实践文集[M].北京: 外文出版社, 2022.
[25] 江进林, 许家金. 基于语料库的商务英语语域特征多维分析[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015(2): 225-236, 320.
[26] 刘艳春, 胡显耀. 翻译共性的解释路径和理论模型刍议[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5): 114-119.
[27] 庞双子, 胡显耀. 翻译汉语和语言接触对原创汉语影响的语料库多维分析[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2024(5): 767-780, 801.
[28] 求是网. 加强国际传播能力建设,总书记要求下大气力[EB/OL]. https://www.qstheory.cn/zhuanqu/2021-06/02/c_1127522717.htm (2021-06-02)[2026-08-22].
[29] 石欣玉. 基于语料库的毛泽东著作英译本中国形象建构研究[D]. 西安:西安外国语大学, 2021.
[30] 宋超, 王克非. 从历时视角看政治文献翻译的去异常化[J]. 外语教学, 2023(6): 63-70.
[31] 王辉耀, 苗绿. 大国智库2.0[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2023.
[32] 王平兴. Remarks on the English translation of “Xiaokang society” and “Socialism with Chinese characteristics”[EB/OL]. https://groups.google.com/g/tacce/c/luUbczh7QoE?pli=1 (2012-12-19)[2026-01-22].
[33] 王兴国. 汉语成语大词典(修订版)[Z]. 北京: 华语教学出版社, 2017.
[34] 许钧. 翻译论[M]. 南京: 译林出版社, 2014.
[35] 徐梅江. 翻译创新与标准译法——十六大文件翻译札记[J]. 上海科技翻译, 2003(3): 2-4, 16.
[36] 张峻峰, 庞影平.《习近平谈治国理政》英译的忠实——机构翻译视角[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5): 148-156.
[37] 张威, 陈钇均. 译出译入,《求是》求实:中国政治话语外译质量读者评估对比分析[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2025(6): 926-938.
[38] 中国时政话语翻译基本规范·英文编写组. 中国时政话语翻译基本规范·英文(第一版)[M]. 北京:外文出版社, 2023.